2013年6月28日金曜日

Evaluation to a web page

I found a web site "Against Fur Zombies "

Author:  There is noinformation about the author, but he/she says that "I like my animal friends alive"

Publisher:  No information about it

Objectivity:  The author of this web site present a limited perspective on the topic. It seems that the author argue this topic more emotionally than rationally, but  there is no extreme or exaggerated language.

Links From:  There is no links to other web sites.

Date:  No information of a date of publication of this web site.

Accuracy:  It is not sure that the facts in the web page are correct because there is no supporting evidences or other web sites, and it seems this web site is managed by an individial, not by an organization.

Evidence:  The author of this web site does not use other web pages as a evidence to support his/her claims. There is no way to contact the author or publisher.

Links To:  There is no web sites link to this web page.


According to the information above, it is hard to say this web site is good. There are few information about the purpose of this web site, who is the author and so on...

Also, there is no other supporting web sites to this web site. So, it is difficult to use  it as an evidence of showing the present situation of animal furs. Moreover, there is no pictures, as well. The readers of the web site would not feel a seriousness of this problem.

Therefore, it is hard to say that this site is a good one.

1 件のコメント:

  1. Dear Ayako,

    You've provided an excellent analysis and use a good set of criteria for judgement. There is one interesting link on the page you've reviewed called "Common Excuses." This page lists the often-used justifications people give for using animal furs. But, even in the case of this informative page, there are no sources listed and we don't know the ultimate source of the information. So, your opinion of the site still applies to that page.
    Cheers,
    Joseph D.

    返信削除