www.veganpeace.com/
Author:
Wanda Embar who is a vegan in Netherland set up this website in order to appeal that we should protect animal's right.She studied mathematics at the iniversity of Leiden. She recommend people to become vegan because being vgan can protect the lives of animals.
Publisher:
This website is sponsoring the author's page. Their mission is to abolishanimal industry that abuses and exploits animals. If you click " Contact me", you can get in touch with Wanda Embar.
Of course, author's perspective is to save animal's right. In the page of "Fur", she show the reality of animals in fur farms with cruel pictures. We can understand how animals are skinned alive. She only show the actuality, so there is no exxageration.
Links from: There are many links about animal right, for example, animal right blog, vegan recipes, etc...
These link support author's idea that we should not kill animals for our lives and they worked.
Date: I could not find the date of publication. Date the docment has reliability because in the webpage, recent things are written.
Accuracy:
The facts are correct and verified because the same things about suffering animals are written in the site of PETA which is the organization to protect animal's right.
Author's conclusion follows the fact that many animals are suffering from exploit.
There is no spelling miss.
Evidence:
In the page og "Fur", there are some links about furs and they support the author's opinion that we should not kill animals for furs or food. We can feedback the author about " Vegan Peace" at the pabge of "Contact me".
Links to:
There are many different site about animal's right.
They are reliable because all sites have information about publisher of the websites.
Those links have the same perspective to author.
I took a look at this site and was very impressed with the creativity and ingenuity that went into producing it. It was clearly someone's "labor of love." I like the fact that various kinds of animals are introduced on one series of pages and they are described in detail, with lots of photos. Then, on another set of pages, labeled "animal cruelty," the same set of animals (including even lobsters) are shown to be used by humans in cruel ways. The site doesn't use exaggeration, which adds to its credibility.
返信削除I like the fact that you noticed consistencies with another website (that of PETA) and you used that as a sign that the accuracy could be trusted more. This is called corroboration and it's one of the critical thinking concepts that we'll learn about in class.